Should Prayer Be the Response to Kidnapping? Edo Residents React to Governor Okpebholo’s Church Comments

Edo State residents have reacted strongly to comments made by Governor Monday Okpebholo during a church service in Benin City, where he urged citizens to pray against kidnapping and insecurity in Nigeria.

The remarks, delivered at LoveWorld City (Christ Embassy), have triggered renewed scrutiny over the government’s approach to the worsening security situation in the state.

Addressing the congregation, Governor Okpebholo called for prayers against kidnapping, cultism, and other security challenges affecting the country.

He stated:

“This country does not belong to kidnappers. No individual or group should hold the nation captive for personal or political interests.”

The governor also urged worshippers to pray for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, asking for wisdom and guidance in managing national security and the economy. He expressed confidence that Nigeria would overcome its current challenges through collective effort and spiritual intervention.

However, following the governor’s remarks, some residents of Edo State have called for more concrete action rather than repeated appeals for prayer. Many questioned why citizens are being encouraged to pray against kidnapping when, according to them, stronger and more visible security measures are still lacking.

why tell people to pray against kidnapping when the neccessary security measures are not been put in place ?

Some residents argued that during election campaigns, promises were made around improved security, job creation, and better infrastructure, but they now feel those expectations have not been fully met. This has led to frustration, with some asking why prayer is being emphasized as a response to issues that require direct government intervention.

You politicians move with strong security around to protect yourselves , why didn’t you pray for protection and move without security ?

Others also pointed out what they see as a contradiction in security arrangements, noting that political office holders often move with heavy security protection, while ordinary citizens continue to face insecurity in their communities. This, they argue, raises further questions about priorities in addressing the security challenges affecting the state.